From df46c5e165e171542941a42da737be4ccebf9c34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: ceriel Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 10:10:56 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Fix for union initializers --- lang/cem/cemcom.ansi/ival.g | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/lang/cem/cemcom.ansi/ival.g b/lang/cem/cemcom.ansi/ival.g index 5ed7c8850..0304d75ef 100644 --- a/lang/cem/cemcom.ansi/ival.g +++ b/lang/cem/cemcom.ansi/ival.g @@ -220,13 +220,19 @@ gen_tphead(tpp, nest) } if (gen_error) return tpp; if (tp->tp_fund == UNION) { + /* Here, we saw a {, which could be the start of a union + initializer. It could, however, also be the start of the + initializer for the first union field ... + */ sd = tp->tp_sdef; - if (AHEAD == '{' && + if (AHEAD != '{' && (aggregate_type(sd->sd_type) || sd->sd_type->tp_fund == UNION)) { - return &(sd->sd_type); + /* In this case, assume that it is the start of the + initializer of the union field, so: + */ + return gen_tphead(&(tp->tp_sdef->sd_type), nest); } - return gen_tphead(&(tp->tp_sdef->sd_type), nest); } p = new_e_stack(); p->next = p_stack; @@ -234,6 +240,10 @@ gen_tphead(tpp, nest) p->s_nested = nest; p->s_tpp = tpp; switch(tp->tp_fund) { + case UNION: + p->s_def = sd = tp->tp_sdef; + p->bytes_upto_here = 0; + return &(sd->sd_type); case ARRAY: p->nelem = -1; p->elem_count = 1; @@ -290,6 +300,11 @@ again: case ERRONEOUS: if (! gen_error) gen_error = pack_level; return p->s_tpp; + case UNION: + sd = p->s_def; + p->bytes_upto_here += + size_of_type(sd->sd_type, "selector"); + return p->s_tpp; default: if (p->elem_count == p->nelem && p->s_nested) { p = p->next; @@ -357,6 +372,13 @@ gen_tpend() if (!gen_error) { tp = *(p->s_tpp); switch(tp->tp_fund) { + case UNION: + sd = p->s_def; + p->bytes_upto_here += + size_of_type(sd->sd_type, "selector"); + while (p->bytes_upto_here++ < tp->tp_size) + con_nullbyte(); + break; case ARRAY: if (tp->tp_size == -1) { *(p->s_tpp) = construct_type(ARRAY, tp->tp_up, -- 2.34.1