From a8f62f44d892d9f537da369f68c20aed92cdd848 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: George Koehler Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 18:11:27 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Remove REG_PAIR. I added REG_PAIR in cfbc537 to speed up the register allocator, because ncg was taking about 2 seconds on each sti 8. I defined only 4 such pairs, so allocating REG_PAIR was much faster than allocating REG REG. After my last commit c5bb3be, allocation of REG REG is fast, and REG_PAIR seems unnecessary. --- mach/powerpc/ncg/table | 61 +++++++++++------------------------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-) diff --git a/mach/powerpc/ncg/table b/mach/powerpc/ncg/table index 1d92d412a..ad74710c4 100644 --- a/mach/powerpc/ncg/table +++ b/mach/powerpc/ncg/table @@ -32,7 +32,6 @@ PROPERTIES GPR /* any GPR */ REG /* any allocatable GPR */ - REG_PAIR(8) /* speed hack for sti 8 */ FPR(8) /* any FPR */ FREG(8) /* any allocatable FPR */ FSREG /* any allocatable single-precision FPR */ @@ -54,12 +53,6 @@ REGISTERS fp, sp, r0 : GPR. - /* speed hack for sti 8 */ - PAIR_R9_R10=r9+r10 : REG_PAIR. - PAIR_R7_R8=r7+r8 : REG_PAIR. - PAIR_R5_R6=r5+r6 : REG_PAIR. - PAIR_R3_R4=r3+r4 : REG_PAIR. - /* f31 to f14 are reserved for regvar. */ f13, f12, f11, f10, f9, f8 @@ -580,12 +573,6 @@ STACKINGRULES COMMENT("stack REG") stwu %1, {IND_RC_W, sp, 0-4} - from REG_PAIR to STACK - gen - COMMENT("stack REG_PAIR") - stwu %1.2, {IND_RC_W, sp, 0-4} - stwu %1.1, {IND_RC_W, sp, 0-4} - from ANY_BHW-REG to STACK gen COMMENT("stack ANY_BHW-REG") @@ -627,15 +614,6 @@ COERCIONS addi sp, sp, {CONST, 4} yields %a - from STACK - uses REG_PAIR - gen - COMMENT("coerce STACK->REG_PAIR") - lwz %a.1, {IND_RC_W, sp, 0} - lwz %a.2, {IND_RC_W, sp, 4} - addi sp, sp, {CONST, 8} - yields %a - from FSREG uses FSREG gen @@ -671,9 +649,9 @@ COERCIONS yields %a /* - * from IND_RC_D to REG_PAIR is not possible, because + * from IND_RC_D to REG REG is not possible, because * %1.off+4 might overflow a signed 16-bit integer in - * move {IND_RC_W, %1.val, %1.off+4}, %a.2 + * move {IND_RC_W, %1.val, %1.off+4}, %a */ from IND_ALL_D @@ -1035,38 +1013,31 @@ PATTERNS with SUM_RR FREG kills MEMORY gen move %2, {IND_RR_D, %1.reg1, %1.reg2} - /* - * This pattern would be too slow: - * with REG REG REG - * ncg can't handle that many registers, and would - * take about 2 seconds on each sti 8. So we use - * REG_PAIR as a speed hack for sti 8. - */ - with REG REG_PAIR + with REG REG REG kills MEMORY gen - move %2.1, {IND_RC_W, %1, 0} - move %2.2, {IND_RC_W, %1, 4} + move %2, {IND_RC_W, %1, 0} + move %3, {IND_RC_W, %1, 4} /* * Next 2 patterns exist because there is no coercion - * from IND_ALL_D to REG_PAIR. + * from IND_ALL_D to REG REG. */ with REG IND_RC_D kills MEMORY - uses REG={SUM_RC, %2.reg, %2.off}, REG_PAIR + uses REG={SUM_RC, %2.reg, %2.off}, REG, REG gen - move {IND_RC_W, %a, 0}, %b.1 - move {IND_RC_W, %a, 4}, %b.2 - move %b.1, {IND_RC_W, %1, 0} - move %b.2, {IND_RC_W, %1, 4} + move {IND_RC_W, %a, 0}, %b + move {IND_RC_W, %a, 4}, %c + move %b, {IND_RC_W, %1, 0} + move %c, {IND_RC_W, %1, 4} with REG IND_RR_D kills MEMORY - uses REG={SUM_RR, %2.reg1, %2.reg2}, REG_PAIR + uses REG={SUM_RR, %2.reg1, %2.reg2}, REG, REG gen - move {IND_RC_W, %a, 0}, %b.1 - move {IND_RC_W, %a, 4}, %b.2 - move %b.1, {IND_RC_W, %1, 0} - move %b.2, {IND_RC_W, %1, 4} + move {IND_RC_W, %a, 0}, %b + move {IND_RC_W, %a, 4}, %c + move %b, {IND_RC_W, %1, 0} + move %c, {IND_RC_W, %1, 4} pat sti /* Store arbitrary size */ leaving -- 2.34.1