From: Mihai Bazon <mihai@bazon.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 08:18:05 +0000 (+0300)
Subject: update with link to discussion about Esprima vs. UglifyJS speed
X-Git-Url: https://git.ndcode.org/public/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=6569e66bf87e5b170ac01f52b32e66639d09b899;p=UglifyJS.git

update with link to discussion about Esprima vs. UglifyJS speed
---

diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 77b7df66..40f925fa 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -83,6 +83,12 @@ test file).
 
 #### A word about Esprima
 
+**UPDATE**: A
+[discussion in my commit](https://github.com/mishoo/UglifyJS2/commit/ce8e8d57c0d346dba9527b7a11b03364ce9ad1bb#commitcomment-1771586)
+suggests that Esprima is not as slow as I thought even when requesting
+location information.  YMMV.  In any case, we're going to keep the
+battle-tested parser in UglifyJS.
+
 [Esprima](http://esprima.org/) is a really nice JavaScript parser.  It
 supports EcmaScript 5.1 and it claims to be “up to 3x faster than UglifyJS's
 parse-js”.  I thought that's quite cool and I considered using Esprima in